God Shows No Partiality
Article written June 11, 2013
by Sis. Mouthpiece
Why do we continue in opposition and contradiction to the
word, after we have read it, and heard the truth? Why do we refuse to change our course? Are we afraid that man will see us as
foolish, or are we afraid that we would be like Moses, and fear that the people
will see the Glow upon his face, and question his power as a leader? He hid his face under the veil, and according
to the word, people are still under a veil today. We have a choice, and whatever you choose, will
identify whether you are of darkness or the light. Jesus saw man's transparency
as Mark 7:13-23. In Romans 1:28-32 (Read on to Chapter 2) And since they did
not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them over to a base/reprobate mine and
improper conduct. They were filled with all manner of wickedness, evil
covetousness, malice. Full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity, they are
gossips, slanderers haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of
evil, disobedient to parents, foolish, faithless heartless, ruthless. Though
they know God's decree that those who do such things deserve to die, they not
only do them, but approve those who practice them. This story of William Tyndale, and other
followers of Christ, received this type of treatment from people that said they
knew the same Christ. We do one another the same way in the name of Jesus.
WE CAN DO BETTER
So I leave you will this connotation, We CAN
DO BETTER, now that the cat is out of the bag, and we have been denied the
knowledge of the word, we cannot say to an all knowing, and all wise God, that
know body told me.
I will like to leave you with this thought. It will confirm
some of this story. I can remember in the early 60's salesman would come around
and sell the big Bibles that were placed in the center of the coffee
table. Our family wanted one of those bibles,
and I believe my father purchased the big black one with the Gold edge pages,
and the gold writing on top. I think my
Grandmother purchase the White one with the same feature. What is my point? My case in point is that those
were the early 60's, and the bibles sold as a sacred books to families, even at
that time we were told not to touch the bible unless we were told.
“Powerful Word”
Is not it sad how the negative marketing of
such a “powerful word” was kept in hiding from a people that God promised would
receive the word written in their hearts and hidden in their minds. We are a blessed people, and I cringe to
think what would have happen had we not investigated and asked questions about
William Tyndale who died as a martyr for the Gospel sake.
WHO IS YOUR JUDAS?
6,000 editions of his
bible was purchased by his Judas [The Bishop of London, Cuthbert Tunstall
(1474-1559] who burned them. Tyndale
wanted the poor people to know the powerful word of God in English. My last question, could it be that the Bishop
of London as a marketable product looked at the word, so he withheld and
refused to help William to make the Bible available to everyone because he saw
dollars and bible colleges instead of simple learning to common people? A kind
of get ahead of the pack, if you will, to start the first school maybe? Remember, I have said the enemy never has
original ideas, he steals or copies from the original, and sells it as though he
wrote or invented it himself. Could he
have been the (Judas) in Tyndale's life?
We all have a Judas or two. They
operate under the Jude 4 principle. I will say to you consider a book that is
so powerful, that it enrages people (duality of the Bible) and it calms
people. That has to be a powerful book.
To those of you that are called to carry the gospel, the New Testament, and the
new Covenant Book found in Hebrews 8:1-13 should revive your soul.
Another Version than a Well to do Scholar
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/smartboard/shop/anecdtes/c16/tyndale.htm
We All Need A Jonathan
At this present time William Tyndale had newly translated
and imprinted the New Testament in English, and the Bishop of London, not
pleased with the translation thereof, debated with himself how he might compass
and devise to destroy that false and erroneous translation (as he said). And so
it happened that one Augustine Packington, a mercer and merchant of London, and
of a great honesty, the same time was in Antwerp, where the Bishop then was,
and this Packington was a man that highly favoured William Tyndale, but to the
Bishop utterly shewed himself to the contrary. The Bishop, desirous to have his
purpose brought to pass, communed of the New Testaments and how gladly he would
buy them. Packington then hearing what he wished for, said unto the Bishop, `My
Lord, if it be your pleasure, I can in this matter do more, I dare say, than
most of the merchants of England that are here, for I know the Dutchmen and
strangers that have bought them of Tyndale and have them here to sell, so that
if it be your Lordship's pleasure to pay for them (or otherwise I cannot come
by them but I must disburse money for them) I will then assure you to have
every book of them that is imprinted and is here unsold: The Bishop thinking
that he had God by the toe, when indeed he had (as after he thought) the Devil
by the fist, said, "Gentle Master Packington, do your diligence and get
them, and with all my heart I will pay for them whatsoever they cost you, for
the books are erroneous and naughts, and I intend surely to destroy them all
and to burn them at Paul's Cross.'
What Happen to His Scholarly Friends
Augustine Packington came to William Tyndale and said,
`William, I know thou art a poor man, and hast a heap of New Testaments and
books by thee for the which thou has both endangered thy friends and beggared
thyself, and I have now gotten thee a merchant which with ready money shall
dispatch thee of all that thou hast, if you think it so profitable for
yourself.'— 'Who is the merchant?' said Tyndale— `The Bishop of London,' said
Packington. — `Oh, that is because he will burn them,' said Tyndale.—' Yea,
Mary,' quoth Packington — 'I am the gladder,' said Tyndale, `for these two
benefits shall come thereof: I shall get money of him for these books to bring
myself out of debt (and the whole world shall cry out upon the burning of God's
word). And the over plus of the money that shall remain to me shall make me
more studious to correct the said New Testament, and so newly to imprint the
same once again, and I trust the second will much better please you than ever
did the first.' And so forward went the bargain: the Bishop had the books,
Packington the thanks, and Tyndale had the money.
Afterwards, when more New Testaments were imprinted, they
came thick and threefold into England. The Bishop of London, hearing that still
there were so many New Testaments abroad, sent for Augustine Packington and
said unto him: `Sir, how cometh this, that there are so many New Testaments
abroad and you promised and assured me that you had bought all?' Then said Packington,
`I promise you I bought all that then was to be had; but I perceive they have
made more since, and it will never be better as long as they have the letters
and stamps. Therefore it was best for your Lordship to buy the stamps too, and
then are you sure.' The Bishop smiled at him and said, `Well, Packington,
well,' and so ended the matter.
I claim no infringement, or have I sold any as my work.
From Edward Hall, Henry VIII, ed. Charles Whibley (1904),
ii. 160 ff.
No comments:
Post a Comment